Why should historians question the bias in General Gage's account of the Boston riots?

Historians should question the bias in General Gage's account of the Boston riots primarily because his position as a British military officer could influence the way he portrayed the events. Being in a position of authority and command over the soldiers, Gage may have had a vested interest in framing the military's actions in a more favorable light and portraying the colonists in a negative manner. This potential bias arises from his alignment with the British Empire and its interests, leading to a narrative that could logically skew towards justifying the actions of the crown and the military rather than providing an impartial perspective.

In assessing historical accounts, it's important to recognize the background and affiliations of the author, as they can significantly affect how events are recorded and interpreted. If historians do not critically assess Gage's probable biases, they risk accepting a narrative that may not fully represent the complexity of the situation or accurately reflect the viewpoints of all parties involved, particularly the colonists.